May 9, 2008

Sun Virus....

the old fashioned kind:
At the company's JavaOne conference this week in San Francisco, 70 people came down with what officials believe is norovirus, a type of medical virus easily spread by touching dirty surfaces. The city's Department of Public Health started receiving reports on Wednesday. On Thursday and Friday, the department warned people who felt they had been infected to stay home. Shawn Dainas, a spokesman for Santa Clara-based Sun Microsystems, which makes servers and software and is accustomed to protecting against viruses of the digital variety, said the company also alerted attendees about the illness by e-mail.

A spokesperson for Mac World went on to note that the Apple conference is still virus free....

May 8, 2008

Funniest. Ad. Ever.

Thanks to Blair for pointing me to it.

May 7, 2008

YouTube HowTo PlayBlues

I really like the home made instructional videos on YouTube. Pretty much anything you can think of, there's a video lesson for it. Installing ceiling fans? Check. Scuba training? Check. Auto repair? Check. Heck, there's even instructional video on how to annoy your co-workers. In other words it's all there.

My favorite how to vid's are usually involve guitar. There are loads of great instructional videos ranging from how to play specific songs to how to play specific styles. I've been spending a lot of time lately on this guys blues instructional page. Really cool stuff. Now, I figure the logical next step is to bring my guitar to work, tape it and, voila, a new addition to the "how to annoy your co-worker" series. (Hint, hint Greg and your bladder pipe). Anyway, some cool, easy blues licks in this embed:

May 1, 2008

Sports Blogs Are The New Elvis

In case you missed it, earlier this week on the Costas show on HBO, Buzz Bissinger - a Pulitzer Prize winning journalist - put on quite a display. The setting was a panel discussion on sports blogs and society and featured Bissinger, the editor of Dead Spin and Braylon Edwards (naturally). What transpired was Bissinger not only throwing an inappropriate tantrum, but also showing why newspapers are in the position that they are - i.e. the brink of distinction.

Here's a link to the clip - it's long but worth watching.

His basic beef is that people write stuff on the internet that (a) he doesn't like and (b) other people can see/ read. His parting quip that he "feared for the future" made me laugh. People were predicting the end of society when Elvis Presley shook his hips on TV, the Beatles wore mop-tops and countless other things. The more things change the more they stay the same.

If he's really this upset about the online world, he should do something about it other than ranting on TV. He should go out and produce a site that has a what he considers to be a palatable online experience and go sell it. In other words go out and compete and try to put your competitors out of business. That's what every other business does. He has the same access to distribution that Deadspin does. Nobody is stopping him. Go change the world.

What journlaists and newspapers have yet to figure out is that news is a product. It needs to be produced and packaged in a way that elicits demand. If nobody wants what your making, re-tool it, re-think it, re-market it or come up with something new. Whining about it, while easy, is not the answer....

Last thought here - I actually find the whole idea of sports journalism to be kind of ridiculous now. People being paid to go to a game and write it up when the stadium is full of people who actually paid money to be there and can go home and write it up for free. Its absurd. Worried about the quality of their work? Great. Go fix that - i.e. see the previous two paragraphs.

April 29, 2008

The 500 Series

Another day, another video of a self re-assembling robot.

At some point, we'll look back at these robots nostalgically. By then, the 600 Series - you know the easy one to spot with the rubber skin - will be obsolete too. Let's just hope he never finds that Plasma rifle in the 40 watt range.

April 24, 2008

Not Switching to Guns, Goose

Another day, another on-board video of a Georgian drone being shot down by a Russian MiG-29.

Do I even need to say that the drone should have hit the brakes and watched the MiG fly right by?

April 23, 2008

Start-Up Rule #2: When Pitching, Bring Your Guy

The second entry (first is here) in what I hope is a continuing series....

You know how when you go to a foreign country, where English is not the native language, how general living becomes simultaneously adventurous and uneasy. This is especially true when you go to buy something. Usually the store owner speaks “some” English, so you can get through the transaction, but you end up getting less information than you would at home. The result of this is that often times you feel like you got ripped off. This is because often times you have been ripped off.

Now same situation, but this time your old college roommate happens to live in the country your visiting. He’s not a native, but he speaks the language fluently and knows the area well. When he comes with you into the store, he brokers the transaction – i.e. he does the talking. When you walk out of the store this time, you feel just like you did at home. Much better.

What’s this have to do with start-ups? This is exactly the dynamic of the funding process. Think of the conference room at the VC’s office as the store in the foreign country. There are people in their selling stuff (money). You are not fluent in the language they speak. You are not a native. You do not know the local customs. Be smart, bring your local guy to broker the deal.

Not sure this is a good idea? Well, look at the other side of the table. VC’s ALWAYS bring their guy. The VC knows that he or she doesn’t speak the same language as you. You’re a coder, an operator, not an investor. You speak in cryptic terms that they’ve heard of, but aren’t really sure about. But they want what your selling, maybe. So they bring their guy every time to broker the deal.

If you’re wondering who is who in the meeting, the VC’s guy is the one who has some experience in your area, is somewhat fluent in your language and asks you a lot of questions about your actual business. This opposed to questions about cap table, burn rate, etc. – the VC’s ask those things. They call this whole process due diligence, but this is just a fancy term for bringing your guy.

So who’s your guy? Could be lots of folks – a lawyer you retain, a business partner who’s been through the funding process before, an advisor who does this type of thing for a living. Could be anyone. But bring him. Don’t wait for the term sheet. Lots is said (implicitly or explicitly) in these meetings that will be used against you later in the process. One of your guy’s main jobs is to make sure this doesn’t happen.

But wait you say – I know start-ups. I worked for one. I know about venture capital. I don’t need to bring anyone. Uh huh. You also had three years of high school French. Let me know how things worked out when you bought that vase at the antique shop in Paris…

April 16, 2008

7 People You Hope You Don't Meet At Your Start-Up

When I moved out to the bay area in June of 2000, I didn't know too much about working for a start-up. 8 years later and I am on number 3. If you read Hacker news or any of the VC/ entrepreneur blogs, there are plenty of folks who talk about start-ups, the lifestyle, the dos and do-nots. All helpful stuff. I'm going to try to add to that list by providing actual examples of good and bad that I've seen in my three start-ups and gives some rules to live by. So, the first of many parts....

Marksonland Start-Up Rule #1: You Can Choose Your Family

Unlike growing up where you parents admonished that you can choose your friends but not your family, in the start-up world you actually do get to choose your family - they're your co-founders and co-workers. They're the ones you'll be laughing, crying, criticizing, celebrating, fighting, teasing, annoying, complementing, brainstorming, traveling, pitching, failing, succeeding, eating, etc. with during your tenure at your company.

Take another look at that list again carefully - take it from me, you will be doing all of that stuff with these people. So when choosing your family, choose carefully. Pick people you think you will be comfortable doing every one of those things with. Everyone has their quirks, but there are certain types of people that you can be on the look out for that, in my experience, are deleterious to a small company. If you see any of these folks, run:

Mr. Big Company: Beware of the person who has spent most of his career working thriving in the modern day bureaucracy known as the big company. Making decisions quickly and decisively is not his forte. (Spending his entire day going from internal meeting to internal meeting is, I think).

This is not to say that anyone who has spent time working in big companies is not a good start-up guy - that's not true. I'm saying stay away from those with big company mentality. Every decision requires a committee and consensus, covering your tracks is more important that moving forward. These folks are bad news for a start-up that has to hunt and kill every day in order to eat.

The Empire Builder: Often going hand in hand with Mr. Big Company, Mr. Empire Builder makes his mark with in the company predominantly by having an ever increasing reporting staff, regardless of need. If he does sales, he'll want to hire lots of territory sales people to manage - even if you have nothing to sell yet (got to pre-sell you know...). If he's in marketing, he'll want to hire lots of marketing minions - even if your in development and there's nothing to promote. He'll make weird claims like marketing should really own facilities since the facilities are.....Creating and owning a large organization is the goal - unfortunately, it's at the cost of the company.

Mr. Gone Native: Every company, big and small, loves to sell to a start-up - especially those flush with VC cash. Vendors will be coming in and out of the office all day trying to close deals. And sales people use all sorts of dirty tricks (they're heartless I tell you!) to do so - fancy dinners, baseball tickets, etc. The whole idea is to get into a personal relationship with the decision maker, because saying no to someone you have a relationship with becomes that much harder. Mr. Gone Native is a sucker for this every time. He mistakes the sales pitch for friendship and then fights hard for his friend come decision time - even at the expense of the Company.

Mr. Insecure: One of the best parts about working at a start-up is that everything is new. As a result, most of the time you get to make decisions that are above your pay-grade, because no one else is there to make them. But don't mistake doing a job with knowing everything about a job. They're very different things. One of the key characteristics of a successful entrepreneur is knowing when you don't know something and not being afraid to ask for help.

Mr. Insecure does not do this. He views asking questions and seeking help as signs of weakness. He'd rather make a bad decision on his own than a good one with help. Obviously, this is not a good thing. The tough part about Mr. Insecure is that he's at times tough to spot. Since he doesn't want people to know his weaknesses (and we all have them) he's very adept at talking out of his you know what. It takes time to sift through the BS and figure out what's happening. Hopefully, by the time you do it, it's not to late.

Mr. Loyalty: Is it better ot be loyal to your co-workers or the company? Say you recruited someone in from another job - they've been working with you for a while and its just clear that they're not working out for any number of reasons? Firing them or demoting them to a proper level is the right answer for the company - easy one, right? Not for Mr. Loyalty. He is loyal to the person, not the organization and thus lets the weak link bring everyone down. Cold-heartedness is a trait of a successful entrepreneur.

Fonzie: That's right. Arthur Fonzarelli. The Fonz. No, no - it's not what you're thinking. Folks who ride motorcycles and wear leather jackets are fine. (And bonus points if they can turn on a juke box with a quick smack.) Fonzie is not welcome in a start-up because he was/ is incapable of uttering the following sentence: I was wrong. (I was wrrrr.....was all the fonz could muster).

All start-ups have one think in common - mistakes are made. Identifying them, owning up to them and moving on is what separates many of the successful ones from many of the failures. The Fonz can't do this. He'd rather bring down the entire organization that admit he made a mistake. So stay away from Fonzie - Ralph and Potsie too, but that's another blog post.

Mr. Needs A Hug. A smooth running start-up is like a well oiled machine - lots of parts moving simultaneously, independently and interdependently. Everyone within the company needs to be able to rely on the other to do his or her job. There is an expectation of competence. Now with that, not every job is going to garner the limelight. If engineering is releases a kick ass product, everyone in the company celebrates. When finance successfully closes the books for the month - usually no champagne.

Mr. Need a Hug's role, while important, is usually in the non-celebratory camp. Thus prompting Mr. Need A hug to, well, need a hug. Or at least a pat on the back. The majority of his or her day is spent making sure everyone in the company knows how important their job is, how good they do it - and, unfortunately, usually how they succeed at it in spite of (as opposed to because of) their co-workers. The real problem with Mr. Need a Hug is that one hug won't do it - they need lots of hugs. Regularly. It's never ending and they never seem happy.

So there you have it - 7 people to try to avoid when you are choosing your new family. There are plenty of others - Mr. Micromanager, Mr. Platitude, Mr. Lie on his Resume, etc., etc. but we all know to stay away from those folks.

Next time I'll post on some folks you DO want in your start-up.

April 15, 2008

Look out Newspapers, Make Room Down There for Magazines

Everyone knows that newspapers are dying off, and it isn't a shocker that magazines are heading in the same direction:
Ad pages for BusinessWeek, which just went through its third round of cuts in three years, tumbled 19.4 percent in the quarter to 429.5 ad pages while rival Forbes dipped 13.2 percent to 504.8 ad pages, according to the latest figures reported to the Publishers Information Bureau.

Fortune looked like the best of the lot, with only a 1 percent drop in the quarter to 429.4.

The newsweeklies are also taking it hard. Newsweek, which recently unveiled plans to downsize 111 people, saw ad pages drop 13.9 percent to 339.

Ad pages for Time, which also continues to prune staffers, skidded 17.8 percent to 371.

U.S News & World Report dropped even further, with its ad pages tumbling 37.5 percent to 229.46 pages.

The only time I buy magazines anymore is we travel - they make good plane reading - and the choice is usually one of the news weeklies, Sports Illustrated or the gossip rags. I'm actually always amazed that anyone buys one of the big, full page glossy ads in any of them. The common characteristic of 99.9% of these ads is that they disappear in the readers hands - no one notices them. Correct me if I'm wrong, but that seems to me to be a bad ad purchase then....

Now with that, there are still some viable magazine ads. Women's magazines on fashion and clothes - those seem like reasonable ad buys. Women buy them to learn about the latest styles and trends - seems like a perfect opportunity for those who make the latest styles and trends to advertise. Lucky magazine is the top of this format - it consists entirely of ads. Its 300 plus pages every month and has no articles, just ads. This is a good business. Same with the verticals. Skiiing magazine is probably a great place to advertise skis, ski wear, etc. Not sure its a huge business, but its a reasonable ad platform.

The rest of the magazine rack - the general purpose weeklies - they seem like they're in trouble. They sell an ineffective product in a shrinking market. Not good. Now, if only they had a plan....

April 14, 2008

The Future of the LA Times - In Mural Form

lat_vision_2010.jpg


A clear, concise vision is always helpful. (via LAObserved)